Monthly Archives: January 2011

More thoughts on paying undergraduates

According to the article “Building a motivated research group”, money DECREASES motivation. Maybe it is better to go with volunteers, and not pay the undergrads. :/ Several studies have shown that money decreases motivation, and one study went on to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on More thoughts on paying undergraduates

Animals in Research, Part II

One of the papers referenced in the IASP curriculum is “Moral community and the responsibility of scientists” (Arthur Caplan, Acta Physiologia Scandinavia Suppl 1986, 128:(554)78-90). Here are my thoughts while reading this paper. Do animals have moral rights? This is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Animals in Research, Part II

Everyone knows exercise is good for you

So why do we need to study it? That is the response I got when I expressed an interest in studying exercise & breast cancer. I was also told “There’s no funding for exercise.” When I’m given these sorts of … Continue reading

Posted in Exercise | Tagged | Comments Off on Everyone knows exercise is good for you

Random science bits of interest to me

It’s interesting to think about what we’re interested in, and why. (Why AM I interested in why I am interested in the things I am interested in?) My favorite general career-searching book, What Color is Your Parachute, includes an activity … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Random science bits of interest to me

Faith of a scientist

This post isn’t about religion. I’d love to put the science-religion war to rest, and Francis Collins is one of my heroes for doing just that. Yes, Virginia, it is possible to have religious faith AND be a scientist. But … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Faith of a scientist

Review of “The disposable academic”

The disposable academic: why doing a PhD is often a waste of time I reign in my own negativity about getting a PhD. This article from the Economist (Dec 16, 2010) is even more negative. The bulk of the article … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Review of “The disposable academic”

Animals in Research, Part I

The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) published a curriculum which is basically like the table of contents of a textbook plus a lot of references. One can read all the references cited and should be able to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Animals in Research, Part I